The evaluations conducted by the partner NGOs on completion of each circle found that 60% of the participants considered the method `very good’ and appropriate for learning, 32% of the participants considered it as `good’, 6% of the participants considered it as a `sensible’ method and 2% considered it as a `poor’ method. Another question on the usefulness of citizen’s participation in the dialogue process, in the context of Bangladesh, saw 60% of the participants feel that the method is `very good’ for the dialogue process; 35% considered it as a `good’ method; whereas 4% of the participants felt that it is a ‘sensible’ or moderate method for the dialogue process and only 1% of the participants considered it ‘poor’. The participant also believed that the method can help the citizens for self-development and empowerment. In this context 43% of the participants considered the method as `very good’; 44% felt `good’; 12% considered it as `moderately good’ and only 1% felt that the method was `poor’ for self-development and citizen empowerment.